• Uncategorized

    Word du jour

    Sulfamethoxazole. Pronounced “sulfa-methox-sizzle”. For rizzle. Say that shit three times fast. It’s a sulfa drug that’s beginning to live in water at low concentrations, and we’re testing its degradation in a TiO2 or TiON suspension. It’s also damned insoluble in water, and I’ve gone through three volumetrics to get a stock solution containing only 0.1000 grams of this stuff.

  • Uncategorized

    Zzz.

    No run this morning. My legs appreciate the break, and my entire body appreciates the extra sleep.

  • Uncategorized

    One mile, high reproducibility

    Today was the first day in my entire life I have run a mile without stopping. I didn’t clock it, because I usually clock my first mile, which includes my 0.25 mi. warm-up, rather than my first mile with a quarter-mile offset. But my first mile was 12:05 today. And the mile run wasn’t killer. By the end of the final lap, I was having some trouble controlling my breathing, and phlegm production had increased significantly. A quarter-mile recovery walk was sufficient for me to pick up and run another 0.625 mi. I would call that a “highly reproducible” run, which makes me all kinds of giddy. I only did…

  • Uncategorized

    Actinometry geekiness and some deep, dark desires.

    We have two lamps. These two lamps are crucial to the semiconductors project, in which we are testing how TiON will photochemically react to degrade several pollutants in water. Now, I don’t know the technical names for these lamps, but I think one is a mercury arc lamp. It shall be known as the Trash Can Lamp, because the merry-go-round reactor is set up in a trash can with a felt covering to keep out other light. It (theoretically) has a strong ultraviolet (UV) output. Our second lamp shall be called the Little Lamp. Its output is mostly in the visual spectrum, and we suspect very little hits the UV…

  • Uncategorized

    Is your conversation offending me? Perhaps I should speak up

    (Initial note: Mae has a blog. Let it be known.) So a recent dispute between C. and Mae has me thinking. (This is a good thing, although there may be some controversy.) Yes, another dangerous thought “thread” has forked off. The question: should we censor the topics of discussion to avoid possibly offending a friend who refuses to speak up on her discomfort? (And I’ll add to that that it’s even unknown whether the topic of discussion is offending the woman, or if she’s just tired of the topic being discussed. She just doesn’t speak up.) For instance: Some woman is Catholic. Let’s suppose, for the sake of argument, that…